Thursday, September 3, 2020

Muscle Cars Vintage vs New Essay Example

Muscle Cars: Vintage versus New Essay Ben Slenning Auto. 10. 28. 08 Period: 1 The vintage car was extremely straightforward, where as the advanced car is high innovation and complex. In a vehicle each part has a particular activity and reason. I am here to explain why the advanced muscle vehicle is a vastly improved item than the vintage muscle vehicle. I will show this in 7 different ways: motor and torque, fuel framework, start framework, efficiency, security highlights, transmission and brakes. The 6 vehicles I will contrast are a 1970 Dodge Challenger with a 2008 Dodge Challenger, a 1970 Ford Mustang Boss 302 to a 2009 Ford Mustang GT, and a 1967 Chevrolet Camaro SS to a 2009 Chevrolet Camaro. The cutting edge muscle vehicles have better motors and more drive then the vintage muscle vehicles. The ’08 Challenger has a 6. 1L SRT Hemi putting out 425hp, while the ’70 Challenger just has a 5. 2L V-8 putting out 290hp. The ’70 Mustang Boss has a 5L V-8, which is putting out 290hp, while the ’09 Mustang GT has a 4. L V-8 putting out about 300hp. To wrap things up, the ’09 Camaro has a 6. 2L V-8 putting out 422hp, where as the ’67 Camaro has a 5. 7L V-8 putting out 320hp. This demonstrating the cutting edge muscle vehicles have improved torque and that the advanced muscle vehicle is a superior item than the vintage muscle vehicle. The vintage muscle vehicles weren’t as lucky to need to fuel frameworks that the cutting edge muscle v ehicles have today. The ’08 Challenger has a multi-port fuel infusion framework and the ’70 Challenger just has a 2-barrel carburetor. We will compose a custom paper test on Muscle Cars: Vintage versus New explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom article test on Muscle Cars: Vintage versus New explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom article test on Muscle Cars: Vintage versus New explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer The ’70 Mustang supervisor has a 4-barrel carburetor, while the ’09 Mustang GT additionally has a multi-port fuel infusion framework. Desire like the ’08 Challenger and the ’09 Mustang GT, the ’09 Camaro additionally has a multi-port fuel infusion framework, where as the ’67 Camaro SS likewise has a 4-barrel carburetor. This indicating better fuel frameworks and that the cutting edge muscle vehicle is a superior item than the vintage muscle vehicle. Third, the start framework on the cutting edge muscle vehicles is far various and better then the ones on the vintage muscle vehicle. For instance, all the vintage muscle vehicles have a wholesaler style start framework. On the ’08 Challenger and the ’09 Mustang GT there is a curl on-plug start framework. The ’09 Camaro has a high-vitality wholesaler less start framework. This demonstrating better start frameworks and that the cutting edge muscle vehicle is a superior item than the vintage muscle vehicles. The vintage muscle vehicles were averaging a lot of lower efficiency then the advanced muscle vehicles. The ’70 Challenger, the ’70 Mustang Boss, and the ’67 Camaro all found the middle value of an efficiency of 10-12mpg. The ’08 Challenger midpoints 13-18mpg, the ’09 Mustang GT midpoints 17-26mpg, and the ’09 Camaro midpoints 16-23mpg. This indicating better mileage and that the cutting edge muscle vehicle is a superior item than the vintage muscle vehicle. Another way that the advanced muscle vehicle is a superior item then the vintage muscle vehicle is in the wellbeing highlights. All the vintage muscle vehicles had, was a safety belt that went over your lap to hold you in the seat. All the cutting edge muscle vehicles have 3-point safety belts and front/side airbags, aside from the ’09 Camaro, which has double stage front/side airbags. This indicating better security and that the cutting edge muscle vehicle is a superior item then the vintage muscle vehicle. The vintage muscle vehicles didn’t have the cutting edge transmissions that are in the advanced muscle vehicles today. For example, the ’70 challenger offered you a 4-speed manual or a 3-speed programmed, where as now, the ’08 Challenger offers you a 5-speed programmed furnished with an auto stick. Additionally, the ’70 Mustang Boss offered a 4-speed manual, a 3-speed manual, or a 3-speed programmed, while now the ’09 Mustang GT offers a 5-speed programmed or a 6-speed manual. To wrap things up, the ’67 Camaro just offered a 4-speed manual or a 2-speed programmed, and now the ’09 Camaro give you a pleasant, smooth ride with a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed programmed. This demonstrating progressively improved transmissions and that the cutting edge muscle vehicle is a superior item then the vintage muscle vehicle. You might want a muscle vehicle with first class slows down, wouldn’t you? Well the cutting edge muscle vehicle is furnished with a vastly improved slowing mechanism then the vintage muscle vehicle. For instance, the vintage muscle vehicles had front circle brakes and back drum brake. Where now all the cutting edge muscle vehicles have 4-wheel plate brakes and ABS. In any case, the ’09 Mustang GT was likewise furnished with footing control. This indicating more secure stopping mechanisms and that the cutting edge muscle vehicle is a lot more secure and a superior item then the vintage muscle vehicle. All in all, the advanced muscle vehicle out does the vintage muscle vehicle by far. Don’t overlook the 7 different ways, as you have recently perused, that the cutting edge muscle vehicle is a superior item: motor and strength, fuel framework, start framework, mileage, wellbeing highlights, transmission and last, the brakes. The cutting edge muscle is a superior item then the vintage muscle vehicle.